Friday, September 7, 2012
Saturday, August 4, 2012
London Olympics - Part Two
There are some great games here in London, like badminton...
... and trampoline.
Except, these are games you can play in your backyard.
If (or when) East Aurora gets the Summer Olympics, I can see a lot more backyard games being added.
It would look something like this...
... and trampoline.
Except, these are games you can play in your backyard.
If (or when) East Aurora gets the Summer Olympics, I can see a lot more backyard games being added.
It would look something like this...
Olympic Can Jam
Olympic Cornhole
Olympic Ladderball
and Olympic Beer Pong
Note: I'm not really pleased with the cornhole pic, but I did it with three different cornhole games. I think you get the idea.
I think the Can Jam game turned out really good. I eliminated the lines and players, and got a pic of the players on the other side (so the same team is facing each other). I played with all the shadows and - voila!
Plus, the logo on the beer pong table turned out good. I put one on a cornhole game but, again, I didn't like the way it was skewed.
Friday, August 3, 2012
London Olympics - Part One
As some of you may have heard, I am the chairman of the organizing committee to bring the 2020 Olympics to East Aurora. I'm in London this month visiting all of the countries' executives and lobbying for votes.
Of course I need to take care of business, so I'm sending a lot of documents home. Too bad all of these London volunteers are dressed in purple and orange. I try to give them my Fed Ex packages, but they ignore me.
I've got other pics and lots of stories to tell of my time in London. Plus, I'll post some of the proposed venues in Aurora.
Tuesday, February 21, 2012
JJW logo
Ever since I can remember, I've been fascinated with letters. Not only words and writing (we'll save that for another day), but the shape of them. The fonts, the geometrics, the symbolism, the effects and manipulation...
One of the earliest memories of letters were the initials on baseball caps and other sports gear. In the 1960s, teams did not have three and four-color computer-generated artwork embroidered on their hats like today. It usually was an initial, occasionally two or three. I always wondered why teams chose looks for their identity. Why did teams like Detroit and Oakland decide to use Olde English style fonts...
...while other teams like Philadelphia, Atlanta and Washington use script?
Why did the Cubs use a perfectly round "C" logo while Cincinnati had a wishbone?
(just to let you know, Minnesota's cap initials stand for "Twin Cities.")
Later, I saw teams manipulating a letter to include symbolism, like the Atlanta Flames adding fire to their A, or
This logo also includes another course I loved: geometry. It is a series of three circles: the red one, the yellow which is twice the diameter as the first, and the blue which is three times the diameter as the red. The circles form the letter W, and the negative spaces form two J's.
Tuesday, January 31, 2012
Tuesday, November 1, 2011
Joe and Teresa and Kim and Pee-Wee
It's been a long time since I posted something, but that doesn't mean I haven't had ideas.
A few months ago I was at the deli waiting for my sandwich when I glanced over at the magazine rack and saw this:
Geez Louise! Again? It makes you wonder if these women publish the magazine (and I swear it wouldn't surprise me if they announced that all three of these women are really men in drag). But the sad thing is, the magazines need articles to publish. The reality shows need publicity to get viewers. They feed off of each other so much that they do become what they are: famous people and best-selling magazines.
Come on. If no one else cares to publish your article or photos, does it automatically become an "exclusive" feature?
Which brings me to that last cover. Look at the top right corner.
Oh yes, the fake marriage. Here is a woman whose claim to fame was a porn tape (where a rapper went pee-pee on her) and now she's on top of the world. Why? Because she has all these cameras following her for her reality show. And she feeds the magazines with "exclusives" and the magazines build interest in her show. And it makes money for everyone.
Here is one last set of photos.
The top one shows Paul Reubens dressed up as Pee Wee Herman. When people see him dressed in that grey suit, they know he is an actor playing a fictional character. If Pee-Wee says he is buying a car, building a house or getting married, we don't really believe it because he is "in character."
In the bottom photo we see Kim. I think we should start thinking of her as the "female Pee-Wee." Whenever we see her in front of a camera, she is playing a character and improvising, just like Reubens does with Pee-Wee. If she says she is getting married, she's not really in love. It's just her character. If she gets a divorce, it's just pretend. If there's a camera in front of her, don't believe anything.
Think about it: did she fall in love with a guy, decide to get married, and THEN have it filmed for her show? Or did she decide it would be a good plotline if she got married, made arrangements to get all these sponsorships (a reported $10,000,000 cost for the wedding) and then find an "actor" to play her boyfriend.
One of the things I read was that her husband wasn't comfortable with cameras following them throughout their days. Really? That is part of her act. How can't you like that?
The sad thing is, a lot of average people who want to be reality stars will make some bad choices. Would Anna Nicole be alive today if she didn't have to act out her life in front of her cameras? (Would Anna Nicole be able to make a living if they didn't follow her?) Would the Octomom have had so many children if she knew no one had any interest in seeing her? There was another "Real Housewife" who was lost at sea recently and had to be rescued. Really? Lost with all those cameramen? And then there is the mother who sent Dr. Phil a video of her disciplining her son with hot sauce. Why? To get on TV and become famous (or infamous).
I think it should all come full circle. The media should start peeing on Kim at the end of her career, just like Ray J did at the beginning of hers.
|
A few months ago I was at the deli waiting for my sandwich when I glanced over at the magazine rack and saw this:
It's a photo of Joe and Teresa (I thought the same thing but, yes, that is a woman) and their "over-the-top second wedding."
I don't really care about those gossippy (did I invent a word?) celebrity magazines. But there was one big thing that caught my eye. Look again at the cover and tell me if you see it.
Well, did you find it? Keep looking...
So, did you see it? No? Well, neither did I. The thing that I was amazed at in this cover story is that it never tells who these two people are. Which means the editors, and the degenerate readers, think everybody knows who Joe and Teresa are.
It turns out she is one of those Real Housewives of New Jersey (or Real Desperate). That issue was from mid-September.
Then I saw this one last week, dated October 25.
I'm serious, people. That is a woman. Honest! And she has an "exclusive" tell-all. Wow! It's going to take a while to digest all the secrets and all the juicy gossip that they are going to dish out.
Guess what? Here is the November 1 issue, that came out only a week later:
Geez Louise! Again? It makes you wonder if these women publish the magazine (and I swear it wouldn't surprise me if they announced that all three of these women are really men in drag). But the sad thing is, the magazines need articles to publish. The reality shows need publicity to get viewers. They feed off of each other so much that they do become what they are: famous people and best-selling magazines.
Come on. If no one else cares to publish your article or photos, does it automatically become an "exclusive" feature?
Which brings me to that last cover. Look at the top right corner.
Oh yes, the fake marriage. Here is a woman whose claim to fame was a porn tape (where a rapper went pee-pee on her) and now she's on top of the world. Why? Because she has all these cameras following her for her reality show. And she feeds the magazines with "exclusives" and the magazines build interest in her show. And it makes money for everyone.
Here is one last set of photos.
The top one shows Paul Reubens dressed up as Pee Wee Herman. When people see him dressed in that grey suit, they know he is an actor playing a fictional character. If Pee-Wee says he is buying a car, building a house or getting married, we don't really believe it because he is "in character."
In the bottom photo we see Kim. I think we should start thinking of her as the "female Pee-Wee." Whenever we see her in front of a camera, she is playing a character and improvising, just like Reubens does with Pee-Wee. If she says she is getting married, she's not really in love. It's just her character. If she gets a divorce, it's just pretend. If there's a camera in front of her, don't believe anything.
Think about it: did she fall in love with a guy, decide to get married, and THEN have it filmed for her show? Or did she decide it would be a good plotline if she got married, made arrangements to get all these sponsorships (a reported $10,000,000 cost for the wedding) and then find an "actor" to play her boyfriend.
One of the things I read was that her husband wasn't comfortable with cameras following them throughout their days. Really? That is part of her act. How can't you like that?
The sad thing is, a lot of average people who want to be reality stars will make some bad choices. Would Anna Nicole be alive today if she didn't have to act out her life in front of her cameras? (Would Anna Nicole be able to make a living if they didn't follow her?) Would the Octomom have had so many children if she knew no one had any interest in seeing her? There was another "Real Housewife" who was lost at sea recently and had to be rescued. Really? Lost with all those cameramen? And then there is the mother who sent Dr. Phil a video of her disciplining her son with hot sauce. Why? To get on TV and become famous (or infamous).
I think it should all come full circle. The media should start peeing on Kim at the end of her career, just like Ray J did at the beginning of hers.
|
Saturday, August 13, 2011
Memphis over Buffalo and Chicago
While bouncing around Netflix last Sunday, I saw that the musical Memphis was available. This was the Tony winner for best musical in 2010 and it will be coming to Shea's this spring. It was taped in HD and shown in theaters in April and the producers took that 2+ hour performance and put it on streaming video, although a DVD copy is not available for rental.
My wife watched it last weekend, and I watched it this Saturday night. It really was a great show with early R&B rock and roll music, great characters and a story that grabbed you. My wife said it was just like RENT without the drugs (she was joking about that. She loves RENT.)
Why is this a big deal? Why is it worth writing in a blog?
Because I chose to watch the musical over the Bills game.
Granted, it was a meaningless, preseason game that turned out to be low-scoring (10-3), I still avoided it.
Next Saturday I'll be at Project Stage III in East Aurora instead of watching the Bills-Broncos game from Denver.
And it's not just these two games.
I plan...TO GO THROUGH THE WHOLE SEASON WITHOUT WATCHING A BILLS GAME!
Oh sure, I'll read the previews and look at the post-game wrap-ups, but I will try to do something other than sit in front of the TV or near a radio and pay attection to the action. I've spent 40+ years watching Bills games and, with the exception of those Super Bowl teams and other playoff action, there's not that much to get excited about. The last 11 years without a postseason have just been a waste.
When I talk about watching the games my neighbor always says, "Well, it will all be in tomorrow's paper." I think it's time to change things up.
Of course, if the Bills start the season 6-0, I may have to start watching.
Because 2011 might be "the year."
My wife watched it last weekend, and I watched it this Saturday night. It really was a great show with early R&B rock and roll music, great characters and a story that grabbed you. My wife said it was just like RENT without the drugs (she was joking about that. She loves RENT.)
Why is this a big deal? Why is it worth writing in a blog?
Because I chose to watch the musical over the Bills game.
Granted, it was a meaningless, preseason game that turned out to be low-scoring (10-3), I still avoided it.
Next Saturday I'll be at Project Stage III in East Aurora instead of watching the Bills-Broncos game from Denver.
And it's not just these two games.
I plan...TO GO THROUGH THE WHOLE SEASON WITHOUT WATCHING A BILLS GAME!
Oh sure, I'll read the previews and look at the post-game wrap-ups, but I will try to do something other than sit in front of the TV or near a radio and pay attection to the action. I've spent 40+ years watching Bills games and, with the exception of those Super Bowl teams and other playoff action, there's not that much to get excited about. The last 11 years without a postseason have just been a waste.
When I talk about watching the games my neighbor always says, "Well, it will all be in tomorrow's paper." I think it's time to change things up.
Of course, if the Bills start the season 6-0, I may have to start watching.
Because 2011 might be "the year."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)